Parker v. Parker

Parker v. Parker, 185 So.3d 616 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)

This decision deals with whether an estate is an indispensable party in a proceeding to recover properties transferred by the decedent prior to his death.  The beneficiaries of the estate argued that the estate was an indispensable party pursuant to F.S. 733.607, which provides, generally, that a personal representative has the right to take control of the decedent's property.  The Court held that since properties transferred during the decedent's life are no longer the decedent's property, the estate does not need to be joined as a party to a suit to set aside those lifetime transfers.


  1. Thanks for the info. Speaking about technologies these days. All of the paperwork is left behind and now it is time to go virtual. Read about data room m&a and it will make sense to you.

  2. I am overwhelmed with emotions like any person who is unreal lucky here more best casino bonuses come in and you will be lucky the same way


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Malleiro v. Mori, Mori and Corallo

Goodstein v. Goodstein

Cantero v. Estate of Caswell