Mullins v. Mullins

Mullins v. Mullins, --- So.3d --- (Fla. 5th DCA 2019)

This decision deals with the effect of an order determining homestead on a beneficiary's interest in the homestead property. Specifically, the Court considered whether a consent to the entry of an order determining homestead, where that order does not properly lay out the ownership interests in the property, is enough to actually alter the parties ownership interests. The Court held that it did not.

The decedent in question left her homestead to her three children, subject to a life estate for two of the three children for as long as they wanted to live there. The probate court entered an order determining homestead which stated that the homestead was devised in equal shares to the three children but failed to mention the life estates. The Court considered whether the homestead order in and of itself could eradicate the life estates. It held that because the consents to the homestead order were not formal agreements to modify the children's beneficial interests in the estate pursuant to F.S. 733.815 and the homestead order was not a title transaction under F.S. 712.01, the homestead order only confirmed that the children were entitled to the homestead exemption and nothing more.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Goodstein v. Goodstein

Rizk v. Rizk

Bitezakis v. Bitezakis